NOTES PREPARED BY
ADIL AHMAD,M.A,M.Phill
TEACHER SCHOOL EDUCATION
DEPARTMENT JAMMU AND KASHMIR
Chapter 5
Pastoralists in the Modern World
Questions
Q1. Explain why nomadic tribes need to move from one place to another. What are the advantages to the environment of this continuous movement?
Ans. There were many need of nomadic tribes to move from one place to another:
i. The nomadic tribes had no regular fields of their own from where they could get fodder for their cattle.
ii. They lived with their herd in the low hills of Himalayas from September to April because; the huge mountains or high altitude were covered with snow during this period. In these areas, the dry scrub forests provided pastures for their herds during this period.
iii. With the onset of summer, as the snow melted and the hills side began to be covered with lush green with a variety of new grasses, the pastoralists started their northward march for their summer grazing grounds.
iv. Again with the onset of winter when the mountains began to be covered with snow and there was dearth of nutritious forage, these
pastoralists on the move again, this time on their downward journey. The movement of the nomadic upward areas and vice-versa
pastoralists from the downward to the
allowed sufficient time for natural
restoration of vegetation rounds. Their continuous shifting provided sufficient forage to the different animals both at the high mountains and the lower hills. They also helped in maintaining the quality of the pastures.
Q2. Discuss why the colonial government in India brought in the following ach case, explain how the law changed the lives of pastoralists:
(i) Waste Land rules: All grazing lands were considered 'waste land' by the colonial rulers as they brought no revenue to them. If this land could be transformed into cultivated farmland, it would result in an increase in land revenue and production of crops such as jute, cotton and wheat.
This is why the Waste Land rules were formulated. However, they sounded the death knell for pastoralists because an increase in cultivated land meant an obvious decline in pastures and a consequent loss of a means of livelihood for them.
(ii) Forests Acts:These were enacted to protect and preserve forests timber which was of earlier
permits which commercial importance. These acts changed the life of pastoralsts. They
were now prevented from entering many forests that had provided valuable forage for their cattle. They issued monitored their entry and exit into forests. They could not stay in the forests as much as they liked because the permit specified the number of days and hours they could spend in the forests.
(iii) Criminal Tribes Act: The British government eyed nomadic people with suspicion and disregard on account of their continuous movement. They could not be tracked down or placed in one particular place, unlike rural
people in villages who were to identify and control. Hence, the colonial power viewed nomadic tribes as criminal. The Criminal Tribes Act was passed in 1871 an were now forced to
further ruined the lives of the pastoralists who
live in notified settlements and were disallowed from moving out without a government permit.
(iv) Grazing Tax It was imposed by the colonial government to expand its revenue income. Pastoralists had to pay a tax on every animal they grazed on The pastures .This right was now auctioned out to contractors.
They extracted as high a tax as they could, to recover the money they had paid to the state and earn as much profit as they could. Later the
government itself started collecting taxes. This created problems for the pastoralists who were harassed by tax collectors. It also became an economic burden on them.
Q3. Give reasons to explain why the Maasai community lost their grazing lands.
Ans. The Maasais lost their grazing lands due to the following reasons
i.In 1885, Maasai land was cut in half by an international boundar between British Kenya and German Tanganyika.
ii. The best pastures were reserved for white settlements, and the Maasai tribes were given arid zone with uncertain rainfall and poor pastures into a small area in south Kenya and north Tanzania.
iii. The British colonial government in east Africa also encouraged local peasant communities to expand cultivation. A cultivation expanded,
pasturelands were turned into cultivated
iv. Large areas of grazing land were also turned into game reserves where pastoralists were not allowed to
v. This lack of good grazing lands and a two-year drought led to losses of almost 60% cattle belonging to the Maasai tribes. Thus, with the expansion of British colonisation, the Maasai community lost their grazing lands.
Q4. There are many similarities in the way in which the modern world the lives of pastoral communities in India and East Africa. Write about any two examples of changes which were similar for pastoralists and the Maasai herders.
Ans. There are many similarities in the way in which the modern world
forced changes in the lives of pastoral communities in India and East
Africa. Here are two examples of changes which were similar for Indian
pastoralists and the Maasai herders:
i. All uncultivated land was seen as 'waste land' by colonial powers. It produced neither revenue nor agricultural produce. This land was brought under cultivation. In most areas, the lands taken over were actually grazing tracts used regularly by pastoralists, so the expansion of cultivation inevitably meant the decline of pastures and a problem, both for Indian pastoralists and the Maasai.
ii.From the 19th century onwards, the colonial government started imposing restrictions on the pastoral communities. They issued permits which allowed them to move out with their stock and it was difficult to get permits without trouble and harassment. Those disobeying the rules were severely punished.
0 Comments